Yesterday·Emerging
Follow-up 1h ago3
95%
FA Cup Replay Ordered After Referee Misapplied Penalty Rules
The FA has ordered a replay of Mulbarton Wanderers' 2-1 FA Cup victory over Woodford Town due to a referee's misapplication of the penalty rules. The referee incorrectly awarded an indirect free kick instead of ordering a penalty retake when detecting encroachment. The replay is set for Tuesday, 29 September.
Quick Facts
- FA Cup qualifying match played
- Penalty goal scored by Woodford and disallowed by referee for encroachment
- Indirect free kick awarded to Mulbarton instead of penalty retake
- Woodford lodged protest with FA
- FA initially ruled protest not permissible


The Football Association has ordered a full replay of the FA Cup qualifying match between Mulbarton Wanderers and Woodford Town following a technical error by the referee. The original match, won 2-1 by Mulbarton on Saturday, has been voided after Woodford lodged a protest with the FA.
The error occurred in the 30th minute when Woodford scored a penalty goal. The referee disallowed the goal, citing encroachment by Woodford players into the penalty area, and awarded Mulbarton an indirect free kick. However, under Law 14 of the Laws of the Game, the correct procedure when encroachment is detected during a penalty kick is to order a retake of the penalty—not to award an indirect free kick to the opposing team. An FA sub-committee confirmed the referee had made a technical error in the application of the rules and determined the match was not completed in accordance with the 2026-27 FA Cup Rules.
Mulbarton initially appealed the protest, which the FA initially deemed not permissible. However, Woodford pursued a further appeal that was reviewed by an FA sub-committee of the Professional Game Board, which ruled in their favor. The replay is scheduled for Tuesday, 29 September, with the winner advancing to face Gloucester City at home on Saturday, 3 October.
Mulbarton expressed disappointment in a statement, saying they were "deeply upset" and warning of "potential wider implications regarding the finality of results for any FA Cup match" and "the integrity of the game as a whole." Woodford thanked the FA for its "thorough consideration" and for ensuring the tie would be "concluded in accordance with FA Cup rules." The decision mirrors a 2006 case involving Edgware Town and Harefield United, when a similar penalty encroachment error led to a replay in English football.
Topics
Why This Matters
The reversal of a completed FA Cup qualifying match result creates measurable operational impact: Mulbarton's advancement is suspended pending replay; Gloucester City's scheduled opponent (originally Mulbarton) remains unconfirmed; the precedent may affect how encroachment errors are handled in ongoing domestic cup competitions. The FA sub-committee's decision to void the match and order replay establishes applicable procedure for similar technical violations in the 2026-27 FA Cup Rules.