Yesterday·Emerging
Follow-up 3h ago5
94%
NewJeans contract lacked sleep, education protections for teen members
The New York Times revealed that NewJeans members signed contracts with HYBE subsidiary ADOR at ages 14–17 lacking standard Korean protections for minors' sleep, education, and health rights. HYBE and Min Hee-jin's camp have disputed responsibility: HYBE claims Min Hee-jin was the contracting party, while Min Hee-jin's side asserts HYBE's legal team led drafting and retained final approval authority.
Quick Facts
- NewJeans signed exclusive contracts with ADOR
- Contracts omitted standard Korean government protections for minors
- Contracts banned 'insincere attitudes' and 'inappropriate romantic relationships'
- Contracts required members to bear cosmetic surgery costs
- Contracts granted ADOR perpetual rights to use members' names, voices, likenesses




The New York Times reported in November 2026 that NewJeans members signed contracts with HYBE subsidiary ADOR between ages 14 and 17 that omitted standard Korean government protections for minors, including rights to sleep, rest, education, and physical and mental health. The contracts were signed in early 2022, before the group's debut, and included clauses banning "insincere attitudes" and "inappropriate romantic relationships," while requiring members to bear costs for cosmetic procedures and granting ADOR perpetual rights to use the members' names, voices, and likenesses.
HYBE and Min Hee-jin's representatives have offered conflicting accounts of responsibility for the contract terms. HYBE stated that then-CEO Min Hee-jin, along with members' parents and legal representatives, negotiated and signed the agreement, and that it included basic human rights protections through a separate National Standard Youth Supplementary Agreement valid until members reached adulthood. HYBE also noted that three months of communications and revisions occurred after the draft was shared in January 2022, with one member's parent later expressing satisfaction with explanations provided.
Min Hee-jin's side disputed HYBE's characterization, asserting that HYBE's legal team led contract drafting while ADOR communicated with parents to convey proposed revisions. According to Min Hee-jin's representatives, HYBE's legal team, CFO, and CEO retained final approval authority, citing internal communications indicating that ADOR's former vice CEO told a parent that "HYBE is involved in the final decision-making process." Min Hee-jin's side also noted that in 2024, when requesting independent contract authority from HYBE, the request was rejected, suggesting ADOR lacked autonomous contracting power at the time of the NewJeans agreement.
The contract included steep exit penalties calculated using a formula that, according to the Times and entertainment lawyers, could increase penalty amounts compared to Korean government standards. HYBE responded that penalty calculations were standard for the industry and included protections, and that even using average monthly revenue during periods with actual sales produced equivalent economic effects. The company also stated that CCTV cameras are installed only in shared practice areas and operated in accordance with law.
NewJeans announced their intention to leave ADOR in November 2024 amid contract disputes and allegations of deliberate undermining of their careers. Band member Hanni accused ADOR of "deliberate miscommunications and manipulation." In response, ADOR sued member Danielle and associates in December 2025 for approximately $30 million in damages and breach penalties. A South Korean court determined that the members do not qualify as workers under the Labour Standards Act. HYBE stated that its exit penalty fees do not exceed industry standards, while an entertainment lawyer representing major U.S. artists called the terms "horrific" by American industry norms.
Why This Matters
K-pop industry labor practices for minors are now subject to documented scrutiny under Korean labor law and international media investigation. The dispute over contract terms and authority affects NewJeans members' ongoing legal claims (including a $30 million lawsuit from ADOR in December 2025), shapes industry standards for minor talent agreements, and influences how HYBE subsidiary governance and legal responsibility are assessed by regulators and investors. Measurable outcomes: court rulings on worker classification, contract penalty enforcement, and potential regulatory changes to K-pop minor protections.
Timeline & Sources
Jan 7, 2022
WireHYBE legal team shares NewJeans contract draft with ADOR and members' representatives
Jan 8, 2022
WireThree months of contract negotiations, communications, and revisions between HYBE, ADOR, members' parents, and legal representatives
Jan 1, 2024
WireMin Hee-jin requests independent contract authority from HYBE; request rejected
Nov 5, 2026
WireThe New York Times publishes investigation revealing contract terms lacking minor protections
Nov 6, 2026
WireHYBE and Min Hee-jin's representatives release conflicting statements on contract responsibility
Sources
- K-pop group NewJeans’s contract omitted rights to ‘sleep and free choice’ – reportThe GuardianMediaNov 5, 2026
- Take an inside look at NewJeans’s record dealThe FaderMediaNov 6, 2026
- ‘NewJeans mom,’ they called her... HYBE: ‘Min Hee-jin was the contracting party; request to reduce cost burden rejected’스포츠조선MediaNov 6, 2026
- [Full Text] Tried to catch Ador, but got caught by Min Hee-jin's hair again… "NewJeans contract criticized by NYT was led by Min Hee-jin" rebuttal [Star Issue]스타뉴스MediaNov 6, 2026
- “HYBE, We Hope You Move Beyond the ‘Min Hee-jin Is Behind Everything’ Theory” ... Min Hee-jin’s Side Rebuts HYBE’s Claim That She Was NewJeans’ “Contracting Party”매일경제MediaNov 6, 2026