Emerging
Jun 18, 20261
61%
University of Cincinnati Disputes Agent's Claim It Knew of Sorsby's Gambling
The University of Cincinnati disputed claims from Brendan Sorsby's agent that the school knew about the quarterback's gambling and did nothing. Sorsby, who was banned by the NCAA for gambling violations in 2022, has declared for the NFL supplemental draft after withdrawing his legal challenge to the NCAA ban.
Quick Facts
Who
Brendan Sorsby
What
University of Cincinnati disputed agent's claim about knowledge of gambling
When
Wednesday (statement issued)
Where
University of Cincinnati
- University of Cincinnati disputed agent's claim about knowledge of gambling
- NCAA banned Sorsby for gambling violations
- Sorsby underwent residential treatment for gambling addiction
- Sorsby sued NCAA and gained court-ordered reinstatement
- Sorsby withdrew legal battle to play for Texas Tech
The University of Cincinnati athletic department on Wednesday disputed allegations from Brendan Sorsby's agent that the school was aware of the quarterback's gambling problem and failed to act. The university stated in a formal statement that all student-athletes receive extensive gambling education throughout the year and that the school would never knowingly play an athlete who violated NCAA sports wagering regulations. "If we ever became aware of impermissible wagering, we would report to the NCAA and comply with sanctions," the athletic department said.
Sorsby's agent, Ron Slavin, made the claims during an interview with KRLD radio in Dallas. The allegations come amid an ongoing dispute between Sorsby and the university. The NCAA previously banned Sorsby from competition for gambling activity in 2022 while he was on the roster at Indiana, including placing wagers on his own team and betting on professional sports. Sorsby subsequently underwent treatment at a residential program for a diagnosed gambling addiction and sued the NCAA, gaining a court-ordered reinstatement that drew widespread criticism directed at Texas Tech, where he attempted to transfer.
Sorsby has since withdrawn his legal battle with the NCAA to play for Texas Tech and declared for the NFL supplemental draft on Tuesday, with a Monday deadline to formally file. The rarely used offseason process is designed for prospects ineligible for the standard draft. He is planning to work out for NFL teams on July 10 at a Dallas-area high school.
Meanwhile, the University of Cincinnati filed a lawsuit against Sorsby in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in February, accusing him of breaching his name, image and likeness contract following his transfer to Texas Tech. Slavin has stated that pursuing legal action against his client is misguided and that Sorsby intends to fight the lawsuit and any resulting damages.
During his final season with Cincinnati, Sorsby passed for 2,800 yards with 27 touchdowns and five interceptions, while also rushing for 580 yards and nine scores.
Why This Matters
This case highlights the tension between athlete accountability and institutional responsibility in college sports. For readers, it underscores how gambling violations—serious NCAA infractions—can derail athletic careers and lead to costly legal disputes between universities and athletes. The outcome may influence how schools handle similar violations and manage NIL contracts with transferring athletes.
Timeline & Sources
Jan 1, 2022
WireSorsby engaged in gambling violations while on roster at Indiana
Jan 1, 2024
WireSorsby sued NCAA and gained court-ordered reinstatement
Jun 17, 2026
WireSorsby declared for NFL supplemental draft
Jun 18, 2026
WireUniversity of Cincinnati issued statement disputing agent's claims
Jun 23, 2026
WireDeadline for Sorsby to formally file for NFL supplemental draft
Jul 10, 2026
WireSorsby tentatively planning to work out for NFL teams