Today·Emerging
Follow-up 1h ago Major5
100%
Trump says Iran could 'take out' LA and San Diego; California officials condemn remarks
President Trump said at a Nebraska rally that Iran could attack Los Angeles and San Diego, calling it a small price for ending the war. California's Democratic leaders, including Governors Newsom and Mayors Bass and Gloria, condemned the remarks as dangerous and deranged. The White House defended the comments as a reference to preventing a nuclear Iran.
Quick Facts
- Trump made remarks at a campaign rally suggesting Iran could attack Los Angeles and San Diego
- Trump characterized potential attacks as a small price for maintaining global safety
- Rally crowd cheered the remarks
- California officials condemned the statements
- White House Communications Director responded to backlash





President Donald Trump said at a campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska on Monday that Iran could "take out" Los Angeles or San Diego, characterizing potential attacks as "a small price to pay" for maintaining global safety during the U.S.-Iran conflict. Speaking to a crowd that cheered the remarks, Trump linked the comment to the ongoing war with Iran and suggested the conflict would end "very soon."
California's Democratic leaders swiftly condemned the remarks. Governor Gavin Newsom called Trump "deranged and dangerous," stating that the President was "advocating for an attack on 10+ million U.S. residents in two of America's largest cities." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said Trump's statements were "dangerous" and could "potentially compromise our safety," emphasizing that the President's role is "to protect the country, not to actively threaten it." San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria rejected the characterization, stating: "San Diego is not collateral damage. We are not expendable. And we are never 'a small price to pay.' Keep our city out of your reckless war talk."
California's U.S. Senators also responded. Senator Adam Schiff questioned Trump's repeated claims that the war would end soon, while Senator Alex Padilla accused Trump of "inviting an attack on U.S. soil" and asking what "kind of Commander in Chief does that."
The White House Communications Director Steven Cheung responded to the backlash, stating the controversy "is not rooted in reality." Cheung said Trump was "clearly stating U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran hadn't been stopped," and argued that "America is safer because of the President. Iran has no nuclear, no navy, no air force, and no money."
Trump has long had a strained relationship with California, particularly with Governor Newsom, widely viewed as a potential 2028 presidential contender. The Los Angeles Times reported that it remained unclear whether Trump's comments were based on any intelligence assessment. U.S. officials have previously assessed that Iran's ballistic missile range is limited to approximately 1,240 miles, though they have alleged Iran's space program could eventually enable development of longer-range weapons. Law enforcement agencies warned California officials in March of potential drone attacks related to the Iran war, though sources told the Times there was no credible intelligence to support such concerns.
Why This Matters
Trump's remarks linking potential Iranian attacks on major U.S. population centers to an ongoing geopolitical conflict have triggered official responses from California state and local government. The statements carry measurable policy and security planning implications: law enforcement agencies, including those serving California, adjust threat assessments and resource allocation based on executive statements about foreign attack scenarios; the characterization of civilian casualties as an acceptable trade-off in conflict strategy raises questions about how U.S. officials communicate deterrence and war rationale to the public and affects voter perception of national security stewardship in the 2024-2028 election cycle. The White House and California officials now occupy conflicting public positions on Iran's military capability and the credibility of the threat scenario.
Timeline & Sources
Feb 28, 2026
WireUnited States and Israel launched war against Iran
Jul 8, 2026
WireUnited States resumed large-scale strikes on Iran, accusing Tehran of violating agreements concerning the Strait of Hormuz
Oct 6, 2026
WireTrump made remarks at campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska suggesting Iran could attack Los Angeles and San Diego
Oct 6, 2026
WireCalifornia officials began responding with condemnation of Trump's remarks
Sources
- Trump says Los Angeles, San Diego could be destroyed amid Iran wartassMediaOct 6, 2026
- Trump's words on presumed Iranian attacks on L.A., San Diego spark backlash in CaliforniaxinhuaMediaOct 6, 2026
- Trump suggests letting Iran ‘take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rallyLos Angeles TimesMediaOct 6, 2026
- California officials condemn Trump for saying Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San DiegoNBC NewsMediaOct 6, 2026
- Newsom, Bass respond to Trump’s ‘take out Los Angeles’ commentsKTLAMediaOct 6, 2026