Geo
Jun 16, 20261
61%
Federal Judge Blocks Enforcement of Idaho's Transgender Bathroom Law
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Idaho cannot criminally charge transgender people for using public restrooms matching their gender identities, temporarily blocking enforcement of a March-enacted law considered stricter than bathroom restriction laws in other states. The preliminary injunction came in response to a lawsuit arguing the law was unconstitutionally vague; Idaho's attorney general plans to appeal.
Quick Facts
Who
U.S. District Judge Amanda Brailsford
What
Federal judge issued preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of Idaho transgender bathroom law
When
March 2026 (law adopted)
Where
Idaho
- Federal judge issued preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of Idaho transgender bathroom law
- Law restricts which bathrooms transgender people can use in public places
- Judge ruled law is unconstitutionally vague
- Judge set parameters for limited enforcement
- Attorney General announced intention to appeal
A federal judge has ruled that transgender people in Idaho will not face criminal charges for using public restrooms that match their gender identities, temporarily blocking key enforcement provisions of a state law set to take effect July 1. U.S. District Judge Amanda Brailsford issued the ruling on Tuesday in response to a lawsuit filed by six transgender Idaho residents represented by Lambda Legal and the American Civil Liberties Union, who argued the law was unconstitutionally vague.
The Idaho law, signed by Republican Governor Brad Little in March, is notably stricter than bathroom restriction laws in at least 19 other states. It applies not only to public buildings but also to privately owned facilities with public restrooms, and imposes significant criminal penalties: up to one year in jail for a first offense and up to five years in prison for a second offense. The law included narrow exceptions allowing use of single-stall restrooms designated for the "opposite sex" only when it is the "only reasonably available" option and the person is in "dire need"—a standard that even the Idaho Chiefs of Police Association found problematic to enforce.
Judge Brailsford largely sided with the plaintiffs, finding the law's language vague and setting specific parameters on its enforcement. Her preliminary injunction prohibits enforcement against someone using a single-stall restroom or when no single-user restroom is available and unoccupied on the same floor as a multi-user facility. The ruling does not entirely eliminate the law but prevents criminal prosecution under the specified circumstances. Lambda Legal lawyer Kell Olson stated the decision allows transgender Idahoans to use public restrooms "without the fear of arrest looming over them" while litigation continues.
Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador announced plans to appeal the ruling, contending that the judge's decision is "results-driven" and misapplies the law. He argued that "biological sex is not vague," suggesting the state intends to challenge the court's interpretation. Despite the ruling, Labrador indicated the law can still take effect regarding changing rooms and some other restroom categories, and he noted it applies to people who are not transgender as well.
The case reflects broader national tensions over transgender rights and bathroom access policies. Lambda Legal and ACLU representatives framed the preliminary injunction as a vital step toward permanently defeating what they characterize as a discriminatory law that violates privacy and fundamental equality.
Why This Matters
This ruling protects transgender individuals from criminal prosecution in Idaho while litigation continues, establishing important legal precedent on constitutional vagueness in bathroom restriction laws. The decision may influence similar disputes in other states and demonstrates how courts evaluate whether gender-based restrictions on public facility access meet constitutional standards. For LGBTQ+ advocates, this represents a significant legal victory; for state legislators considering bathroom laws, it signals potential constitutional vulnerabilities in overly broad or vague language.
Timeline & Sources
Jun 16, 2026
WireU.S. District Judge Amanda Brailsford issues preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of law
Jul 1, 2026
WireOriginal date set for law to take effect (now partially blocked)